san francisco superior court law and motion

8H-8, Enforcing Demand: 8:1484, 8:1487; contra CCP 2031.310 (b-c) (a motion to compel further shall set forth good cause for the demand and shall be filed within 45 days of service of the unsatisfactory response). ) ) ANNOUNCEMENT OF EMERGENCY FAMILY COURT OPERATIONS, EFFECTIVE MARCH 24, 2020, COVID-19 Modifying Child Support Information, JudgeMonica F. Wiley, Supervising Judge 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT In a summary judgment or summary adjudication motion, no opening or responding memorandum may exceed 20 pages. ) (415) 551-3747, Judge Braden Woods ) ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 (SeePanos v. Great Western Packing Co. (1943) 21 Cal.2d 636, 638.) UPA served the original responses to the same RPODs and FIs months prior. 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING Phone: 415-705-1033 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: SEAL UNREDACTED RESPONSIVE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 5 9 ANDREW WIECKS, ) Department: 404 When a consumer has served such objections, the party seeking the information has the burden of moving the court to enforce the subpoena. ) 11 ) ) District 1 Sandra Lee FewerDistrict 2 Catherine StefaniDistrict 3 Aaron PeskinDistrict 4 Gordon MarDistrict 5 Dean PrestonDistrict 6 Matt HaneyDistrict 7 Norman YeeDistrict 8 Rafael MandelmanDistrict 9 Hillary RonenDistrict 10 Shamann WaltonDistrict 11 Ahsha Safai, Office of the City Administrator City Hall, Room 362 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place San Francisco, CA 94102. Note from the Court: When calling these numbers, please leave a message with your question, transaction number (s) and a toll-free phone number (or a phone number where the court can place a collect call). ) The Court maintains jurisdiction to determine whether sanctions are appropriate in spite of UPAs dilatory responses. 4 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) ) ) Whether a party or their representative will be appearing in person or by Zoom must be part of the notification given to the Court and other parties as stated below. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: CHANGE OF SPOUSAL OR PARTNER 3 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO This is wholly insufficient to inform the court or Plaintiff of exactly which allegations are at issue. However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. ) SFPKOA filed the instant motion on November 4, 2022. This matter is on calendar for Moving Defendants motion to strike the request for punitive damages from the Complaint pursuant to Cal. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM CRC 3.1203(a) (amended eff 1/1/08).When notice of an ex parte application is given, the person giving . 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM For all law and motion matters, the court will post tentative rulings and follow the procedures set forth in San Francisco County Superior Court Local Rule 8.3 et seq. 9 LUCY GUEVARA, ) Department: 403 ) ) ) (Evid. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 5 ) 9 ULRICH SCHMID-MAYBACH, ) Department: 403 11 ) 6 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) ) Rules of Ct. 9.40 (c) (1) .) Mandatory relief is only proper where default or dismissal has been entered as a result of the acts or omissions of the attorney. ) Please wait a moment while we load this page. january 18, 2023 law and motion calendar page 9 judge: honorable marie s. weiner, department 2 _____ 2:00 21-udl-00401 are-san francisco no. 11 ) B. Oppression means despicable conduct that subjects a person to cruel and unjust hardship in conscious disregard of that person's rights. Consequently, Trellis makes the information and legal analyses contained in San Francisco County County tentative rulings searchable for attorneys, parties, and the public. The courts tentative ruling will become the order of the court unless the court has directed the parties to appear or a party gives notice of an intent to appear and argue the motion. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF VIS 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 9 SHUMPEI KAWASAKI, ) Department: 404 ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 7. ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM The Court usually issues tentative rulings two days before most law and motion matters. 6 EMMA L GONZALEZ, ) Case Number: FLD-16-396370 ) ) 6 XINYI VENTALI TAN, ) Case Number: FDV-22-816325 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 11 ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs have not shown argued or indicated that the objections present in the current motion are new, or were not asserted in the original discovery responses. 11 ) Evictions (unlawful detainers) and cases that are not assigned to a direct calendar department are managed by Department 511. It is first worth noting that Defendants memorandum of points and authorities requests to strike surplusage from multiple paragraphs, but this request is not enumerated as required under California Rule of Court, Rule 3.1322. 5 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 5th 531, 557 & fn. 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING Defendant alleges, and the filings show, that the default was entered as to Defendant both as an individual, and Trustee. 6 CHRISTOPHER BROWN, ) Case Number: FLD-22-396948 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 5 Finally, SRMH, only actually addresses the claim for punitive damages in its memorandum of points and authorities and presents no argument or discussion whatsoever regarding the portions of the complaint which it actually requests the court to strike, i.e., the prayer for attorney fees and cost of suit as well as irrelevant references to careless, reckless, wanton, unlawful, offensive, and grossly negligent conduct. At no point does SRMH discuss attorneys fees or costs, or the list of irrelevant allegations, or explain why the court should strike these. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: JUDITH HARDING 11 ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM The court is unable to discern of SRMH wishes to strike only the words listed, whether it wishes the court to strike all such words, or whether it asks the court to strike broader allegations which SRMH claims falls within the meaning of the words used. (415) 551-3741, Judge Daniel A. Flores 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 6 KITTY TRAWINSKI, ) Case Number: FDI-11-775537 As such, any venue determinations are properly derived under that section of the CCP. After submission of the order, the Court will sign the Amended Judgment. Civic Center Courthouse 11 ) Tentative rulings in San Francisco County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. Hours: Public Hours: 8:00 a.m. - 4:30 p.m. ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ), (e) Application to file longer memorandum. 6 ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE SPOU 3 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: DETERMINATION OF PREVAILI 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ), The elements the cause of action for a claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress are: (1) extreme and outrageous conduct by the defendant with the intention of causing, or reckless disregard of the probability of causing, emotional distress; (2) the Plaintiff's suffering severe or extreme emotional distress; and (3) actual and proximate causation of the emotional distress by the defendant's outrageous conduct. (Christensen v. Superior Court (1991) 54 Cal.3d 868, 903, internal citation omitted.) A party to whom a document demand is directed must respond to each item in the demand with an agreement to comply, a representation of inability to comply, or an objection. 9 PATRICIA OJEDA GOMEZ, ) Department: 404 ) Please note that law and motion matters are heard by appointment ONLY in all civil IC departments as per Local Rule 2.1.19. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 6 YUNI HEFFERNAN, ) Case Number: FDI-22-797102 Code of Civil Procedure (CCP) sections 1985.3(g), 1985.6(f), 1987.1; see also Monarch Healthcare v. Sup.Ct. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 6 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-15-351058 Plaintiff alleges eleven causes of action. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Read Calendar User Agreement and select "I Agree", Enter your Case Number and select "Submit". ) A motion to strike is also properly directed to unauthorized claims for damages, meaning damages which are not allowable as a matter of law. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: TEMPORARY EMERGENCY ORDER, 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO The motion to compel medical records pursuant to subpoena is DENIED without prejudice to Defendant seeking some additional medical information should it demonstrate a specific, particularized need in light of the information which Plaintiff and Joe have provided. ) Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. ) ) If only part of an item or category demanded is objectionable, the response must contain an agreement to comply with the remainder, or a representation of the inability to comply. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 ) Turman v. Turning Point of Central Calif., Inc. (2010) 191 Cal.App.4th 53, 63. ) There is a fee for the ex parte hearing payable at the time of filing, unless you have a waiver of fee on file. ) You have reviewed and understand the law and motion rules of your assigned Civil department. 7 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-06-339819 Department 405 ) (3) Upon the request of a party to the action, any party citing any authority other than California cases, statutes, constitutional provisions, or state or local rules must promptly provide a copy of such authority to the requesting party. 11 Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH See below for additional requirements for unlawful detainers and other civil cases. Clinic, Inc. v. Sup.Ct. Civil Code 3294 authorizes the recovery of punitive damages in noncontract cases where the defendant has been guilty of oppression, fraud, or malice Malice means conduct which is intended by the defendant to cause injury to the plaintiff or despicable conduct which is carried on by the defendant with a willful and conscious disregard of the rights or safety of others. Criminal records are not available online. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 5 ) ) 6 JAMES MALCOLMSON, ) Case Number: FDI-20-794078 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 6 JIAWEI TAN, ) Case Number: FDI-21-795548 11 ) Plaintiff filed a motion for OSC re Contempt and Sanctions on January 14, 2022, alleging in part that no supplemental responses had been served in violation of the Courts September 3, 2021 order. Therefore, the Court cannot find that UPA has waived their objections. Where no response was served to a RPOD, there is no time requirement in moving to compel, nor any requirement to show good cause for the production requested. ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 11 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Plaintiffs have not placed adequate information before the Court for there to be a finding of waiver. ) 6 GISELA CHRISTINE MARQUEZ GELLIDON, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796947 Additionally, the motion must advise the attorney that joint and several liability against the attorney is sought for the sanctions. Sacramento County Superior Court Prerogative Writ Departments. Exchange(2006) 135 Cal.App.4th 1138, 1144. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 There is no evidence that responses which comport with the Courts order were ever served. 9 CYRUS YAMIN, ) Department: 404 Although this is a single department hearing many types of law and motion cases, Department 302 has decided many important petitions for writ of administrative mandamus. 6 9 KEVIN OMAR LASTRE, ) Department: 403 CCP 1292.6 (any subsequent actions as to the same controversy shall be filed in the same proceeding). Ct. (1982) 31 Cal.3d 921, 929. ) Department Hours and Locations Presiding Judge 720 9th Street, 6 th Floor 8:30 a.m. to 12:00 noon and 1:30 p.m. to 4:30 p.m. Law and Motion Department 53 813 6 th Street, 2 nd Floor The court may take judicial notice of court records of this state. A primary basis for Plaintiffs claims is that she was entitled to disability accommodations because her husband, Joe, was immune-compromised and of a group particularly vulnerable to Covid-19. Unverified responses are tantamount to no responses at all. Petitioner Just-In Time, Inc. (Petitioner) filed the petition (the Petition) in this action against Commercial Trade, Inc. (Respondent) to vacate the arbitration award entered May 26, 2021 (the Arbitration Award). ) Department 404 Plaintiffs counsel shall submit a written order to the court consistent with this ruling and in compliance with California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1312. See CCP 2031.300; see also Cal. It is uncontested that UPA has served supplemental responses at the time of this hearing. The motion is GRANTED with leave to amend. With this limitation, the court GRANTS the requests for judicial notice. (CCP) 473 (d) to set aside the default. Actions against corporations are triable in the county where it has its principal place of business, where the contract was made or to be performed (whether specified in writing or not), or where the obligation or liability arose or the breach occurred. 5 ) 11 ) ) But this is a legal impossibility: a defendant has onlyoneduty, measured byonestandard of care, under any given circumstances. (Ibid. ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Respondent filed Fresno County Court Case 20CECL04302 on August 17, 2020. ) ) You must serve the other party or their lawyer with a copy of your motion. CourtCall is not permitted for this calendar. Scheduling a Hearing (Ex Parte and Noticed Motion), 2021 Superior Court of California, County of San Diego, https://www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings, Unlawful Detainer (Landlord-Tenant) Hearings. 8 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 3, 2023 ) 5 9 KAILIN WANG, ) Department: 404 9 ONDINE LIOR NUCHI, ) Department: 404 ) Leave a message with the following information: Your name, and that you want to appear. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF REQUEST FOR ORDER 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 4 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Generally, supplemental demands to RPODs may be served twice prior to trial setting, and once after the initial setting of a trial date, requesting that the prior production be updated and affirmed. In the context of original replies, timely unverified responses containing both objections and answers may serve to maintain objections. ) The largest division in the San Francisco Superior Court, the Civil Division conducts civil trials and manages civil filings, records, small claims cases, appeals, probate matters, unlawful detainers, defaults, case management, dispute resolution, name changes, and civil restraining orders to prevent harassment and elder abuse. ) After extensions, SFPKOA served responses on May 25, 2021. ) ) ) (I)f a party fails to show that a judgment has been taken against him through his mistake, inadvertence, surprise or excusable neglect the court may not grant relief. (Central Pathology Service Med. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 9 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Accordingly, the demur to the seventh, eight, and tenth causes of action is SUSTAINED without leave to amend. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF CHILD 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Defendant points out on reply that Plaintiffs opposition was late. reserve a hearing date with the applicable department. 11 ) The receivers portion of the name refers to a legal proceeding where the Superior Court takes control of property and assets in certain disputes. 6 JACQUELINE M SCHLIFKE, ) Case Number: FDI-15-783643 Plaintiff seeks $1,500 for two motions, representing expended attorney time and fees. 5 ) ) 11 ) 6 BECKY M. DE MARCO, ) Case Number: FDI-15-783160 ) Where no response was served to a FI, there is no time requirement in moving to compel, nor any requirement to meet and confer. The San Francisco Superior Court offers online access to Civil case filings, Tentative Rulings, and pay Traffic citations. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 5 CCP 2030.070 (a)-(b). The prevailing party shall prepare and serve a proposed order consistent with this tentative ruling within five days of the date set for argument of this matter. Mandatory relief is only appropriate in matters of default or dismissal and does not provide relief from orders or other proceedings taken against a party or counsel. Leader v. Health Industries of America, Inc.(2001) 89 Cal.App.4th 603, 616, quoting CCP 473(b). 5 5 908.) 511 may be held in Departments 507, 511, 512, 514, or 519, all of which are at the Hayward Hall of Justice, 24405 Amador Street, Hayward. All hearings will be conducted remotely by CourtCall or by videoconference. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 11 ) 11 ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 9 MEGHAN WAHL, ) Department: 403 If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, 6 ULIANA POPOV, ) Case Number: FDI-20-793286 100 As such, it is not adequately noticed, and is not considered. Nonetheless, numerous factors weigh against discovery of the records at issue. Judges often set a motion cut-off date or deadline. 11 ) The Superior Court of California, County of Fresno is currently seeking applications from individuals interested in accepting appointments to represent parties pro bono in their civil proceedings. Guide to the San Francisco Superior Court. 5 9 JASA BLACKWELL et al, ) Department: 404 9 CLIFFORD GADYE, ) Department: 404 ) If the tentative ruling is accepted, no appearance is necessary unless otherwise indicated. Phone Number and Phone Hours : (650) 363-4300 or (650) 261-5100 option 5 . ) It is clear that UPA has failed to serve timely responses, and therefore Plaintiffs are entitled to sanctions. However, when a plaintiff suffers a single personal injury by reason of the wrongful act of a defendant, there is ordinarily only one cause of action. This is without prejudice to Defendant seeking some additional medical information should it demonstrate a specific, particularized need in light of the information which Plaintiff and Joe have provided. The court may construe the absence of a memorandum as an admission that the motion or special demurrer is not meritorious and cause for its denial and, in the case of a demurrer, as a waiver of all grounds not supported. Results. 8 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 6 NEHA DUA BREJA, ) Case Number: FDI-21-795427 ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES Based on the foregoing, Plaintiffs motion is MOOT. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 5 San Francisco, CA 94102 The court notes the opposition is untimely and does not make any such argument related to the substance of this motion. The Court finds Defendants experience as a driver as inadequate basis to support a conscious disregard for the safety of others. 10 RICHARD K TANG, ) Department: 403 This may require the moving party to quote the language verbatim if consisting only of specific phrases, words, or sentences, but the moving party need not quote the language if seeking to strike an entire paragraph, point, count, or the like, as long as the moving party has adequately identified that section of the complaint at issue. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) Before Trial Ch. The protection is not absolute, however, and the information is discoverable where the need for discovery outweighs the privacy concerns. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 ) ) Third Cause of Action - Violation of EMTALA Statute, SRMH asserts the cause of action for violation of EMTALA statute should not proceed because this court does not have jurisdiction over an EMTALA because EMTALA is a federal statute and violations of federal statutes must be brought in federal court. (MP&A p. Further these actions are already pled in the prayer for relief. (MP&A p. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 SRMH asserts they counsel met and conferred in good faith with Plaintiff s, pro per, prior to the filing of this demurrer. ) ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 7:9-10.). 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: SEALIN 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO A memorandum that exceeds 15 pages must also include an opening summary of argument. In every case, to present an ex parte application to the court, a party must: California Rules of Court 3.1200 et seq. The court therefore SUSTAINS the demur to the eleventh cause of action without leave to amend, as Plaintiffs claims are directly related the professional services received. 5 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 11 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA CCP 2031.050 (a)-(b). ) Motions In every case, to present a motion to the court, a party must: ) ) Reserve Traffic Court Date; Law & Motion Calendars; Informal Discovery Calendars; Tentative Rulings; . 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 ) The preparing party shall submit the proposed order and any objections to the court in accordance with California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1312. TEMPORARY Virtual Hearing Links During Microsoft Teams Outage https://www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings. 6 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-11-346715 Untimely responses to discovery requests waive all objections. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 11 ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 13, 2022 ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES Local Rules of Court Effective January 1, 2023, 2023 Superior Court of California - County of San Francisco, Caf at Civic Center Courthouse - Starchef, Information Regarding Coronavirus and Court Operations, Local Rules of Court Effective July 1, 2022, Local Rules of Court Effective May 10, 2022, Local Rules of Court Effective April 1, 2022, Local Rules of Court Effective January 1, 2022, Local Rules of CourtEffective July1, 2021, Local Rules of CourtEffective January 1, 2021, Local Rules of Court Effective July 1, 2020, Local Rules of Court Effective January 1, 2020. ) CRC 3.1304(c) and (d) (amended eff 1/1/16) > > Read More.. NEW RULE AMENDMENTS EFFECTIVE APRIL 1 . County of Los Angeles (2004) 120 Cal.App.4th 1389, 1394.) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 12 ) ) 6 JOSE CARLOS SALAS PILLACA, ) Case Number: FDI-20-793011 A party may apply to the court ex parte but with written notice of the application to the other parties, at least 24 hours before the memorandum is due, for permission to file a longer memorandum. 12 REVIEW HEARING ON PARENT 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO CCP 396b(a) provides that except as otherwise provided in section 396a: (I)f an action or proceeding is commenced in a court having jurisdiction of the subject matter thereof, other than the court designated as the proper court for the trial thereof, under this title, the action may, notwithstanding, be tried in the court where commenced, unless the defendant, at the time he or she answers, demurs, or moves to strike, or, at his or her option, without answering, demurring, or moving to strike and within the time otherwise allowed to respond to the complaint, files with the clerk, a notice of motion for an order transferring the action or proceeding to the proper court, together with proof of service, upon the adverse party, of a copy of those papers. 11 ) ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 6 CESAR ALDERERETE, ) Case Number: FLD-22-396959 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 ) ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: SPOUSAL 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 1988) Torts, 838, p. Cheng San Francisco Superior Court: Alfred G. Chiantelli San Francisco . Based on the foregoing, the Motion is GRANTED. ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: RESCISSION OF THE STIPULA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 12 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 9:1-3.). 5 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 Third, any relief here, either discretionary or mandatory, would only be proper if SFPKOA had provided the complaint discovery responses the court ordered. ) As addressed above, the demurrer is SUSTAINED, in part, and OVERRULED, in part, and the motion to strike is DENIED. ) The Hon. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Dawes v. Superior Court(1980) 111 Cal.App.3d 82, 89-90 (Dawes). 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: SPOUSAL OR PARTNER S 3 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO (1) A judge may require that if any authority other than California cases, statutes, constitutional provisions, or state or local rules is cited, a copy of the authority must be lodged with the papers that cite the authority. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 ) ) ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Superior Court of California - San Joaquin Civil Department 180 E Weber Ave., Suite 200 Stockton, CA 95202. ) ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE STATUTORY FEES 6 YERAY LARA MARTIN, ) Case Number: FDI-22-795874 5 As with demurrers, the policy is to construe pleadings liberally with a view to substantial justice. (CCP 452.) A tentative ruling is a preliminary ruling that states how a court intends to rule on a motion, and courts may modify or reverse civil tentative rulings prior to issuing final rulings, hence the term tentative.. ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) He alleges that this has resulted in permanent injuries. ) ) In every case, to present a motion to the court, a party must: A party must give notice of the hearing as required by law. ) 11 ) (MP&A p. 6 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-06-340792 Department 405 ) ) 6 WYNTER HICKS, ) Case Number: FDV-22-816138 Britt, supra, 20 Cal.3d 859-862. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: REIMBURSEMENT OF CHILD EXPENS 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO CCP 1292(a) & 1292.2. ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: RESPONDENT TO ENROLL PETIT 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 9 MICHAEL PUENTE, ) Department: 403 ) Local Rule 8.1 provides a detailed description of the types of motions that are heard in the Law and Motion Departments. ) (Laird) obtained medical history and information from Plaintiff, learned of the various symptoms, and took his blood pressure, but then told Plaintiff merely to go home, relax, and eat some food without conducting any further test or examination. For Case Management Conferences, Law and Motion hearings, and Ex Parte hearings, parties may appear remotely pursuant to Civil Code of Procedure section 367.75 and California Rule of Court, rule 3.672. . 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Effective December 4, 2020, reservations for most Civil Independent Calendar Department motions may be made using the Courts Reserve a Motion Date application which can be accessed by clicking here or the link on the Courts homepage under Online Services.To schedule a hearing, call the numbers listed below.